Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160913
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 19 '18 at 03:26
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 241 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 771 76% 623 Pts	64-Core 949 59% 949 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 115 Parallax 108 88% 110 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 97.6 Splatting 102 80% 97.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 362GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 20031 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 195 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 80 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8751572678	100% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 409 Mixed 420 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 37.9 139% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 117 126% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 2,154 Write 787 Mixed 1,036 290% 1,326 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 44.9 178% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 167 172% 282 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 61GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16125 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 112 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 55 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 88 88 11668 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4195794070	105% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 407 Mixed 418 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 44 156% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 118 126% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1402 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 80.1 Write 105 Mixed 107 74% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.31 80% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 64%
WD WD1500AHFD-00RAR5 150GB 1,105 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 7GB free Firmware: 20.07P20 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 159 4691 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3150 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 20 20 58425 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3128 (C2) HDA temperature 108 88 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	28.4% Poor	Read 48.1 Write 50.4 Mixed 47.5 37% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.5 117% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 47%
Maxtor 6L300S0 300GB-$45 2,416 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 7GB free Firmware: BANC1G10 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 202 164 17035 (04) Start/Stop count 251 251 4484 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 247 234 49523 (09) Power-on hours count 30 30 48614 (0A) Spinup retry count 216 216 30 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 244 244 3603 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 41 253 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 2575 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 252 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 252 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 252 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 229 226 20 (D0) Spin buzz 252 252 1 (D1) Offline seek performance 240 240 160 (D2) Unknown 253 252 0 (D3) Unknown 253 252 0 (D4) Unknown 253 252 0	20.1% Poor	Read 38.4 Write 30.4 Mixed 35.8 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.35 123% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 4,091 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 41.5 MC Write 51 MC Mixed 40.8 127% 44.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	301x
Core i7-6950XIntel $499Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	181x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	175x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	63x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,766

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16