Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '18 at 02:41
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189 5,121 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 210 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 631 60% 499 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36B6) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 116 Parallax 102 92% 110 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 93.3 80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 61 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 181351413	53% Above average	Read 265 Write 211 Mixed 217 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 22 90% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.3 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 18.9 22% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 129%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB 11,642 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 622GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 178 175 4058 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1998 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 18 18 60064 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1510 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 234 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1763 (C2) HDA temperature 115 89 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3 (F0) Head flying hours 27 27 53338 (F1) Unknown 200 200 27198035896 (F2) Unknown 200 200 35275603846	51.8% Above average	Read 91.7 Write 88.6 Mixed 88.8 68% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.35 95% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 208GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 97670912 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 783 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 107297912 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 36187 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 278 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 71 47 13373276189 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 170 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 15 15 170447 (C2) HDA temperature 29 53 -140737488355299 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 59575491398456 (F1) Unknown 100 253 22542949094 (F2) Unknown 100 253 29121231234	86.5% Excellent	Read 155 Write 147 Mixed 144 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.23 76% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 132GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 179 5791 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1192 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 22 22 57573 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 510 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 2200313 (C2) HDA temperature 119 100 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 46.9 Mixed 59.6 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.14 57% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Mushkin 998995 4x4GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 32.9 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 12.1 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	271x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	145x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	115x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	109x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	65x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	36x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	64x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16