Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '18 at 22:10
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 794
81% 652 Pts
64-Core 800
50% 800 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 149
Parallax 125
108% 135 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 131
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 1,371
Mixed 1,354
342% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 24.3
178% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 191
193% 309 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 228%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
6GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 443
Mixed 473
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 26.8
141% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 91.2
136% 256 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 116%
Seagate ST3500841AS 500GB
163GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 56.7
Write 52.7
Mixed 56.7
42% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.28
66% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 34%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
31GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 90.6
Mixed 84.4
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.65
158% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4133 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3066 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback