Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 16 '18 at 13:52
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 960-$220 16,233 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 172 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 425 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3713) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2751 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 397.64 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 154 Parallax 131 97% 135 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 153 Splatting 121 108% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 159GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11018 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 193 (B1) Unknown 98 98 33 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 45 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 149 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20758046847	65.2% Good	Read 377 Write 188 Mixed 237 59% 267 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 35.8 4K Mixed 30.1 101% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 124 DQ Mixed 72.1 78% 132 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 35882 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 573 (B1) Unknown 90 90 338 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 6 (EB) Unknown 99 1 353 (F1) Unknown 99 99 64504436364	61.2% Good	Read 377 Write 227 Mixed 279 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 20.5 82% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 140 DQ Mixed 64.2 75% 131 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 116%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 196GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34385297797 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3945 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11019 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 190 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4084 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4084 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 206159544360 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	89% Excellent	Read 161 Write 149 Mixed 37.1 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 3.97 4K Mixed 0.37 146% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 113%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 101GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2 (03) Spinup time 155 151 5233 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8967 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 1 1 81589 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2077 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1000 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8966 (C2) HDA temperature 107 84 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 6 6 68656 (F1) Unknown 200 200 168438398948 (F2) Unknown 200 200 227145177086	44.3% Average	Read 81.4 Write 72.3 Mixed 52.4 51% 68.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.34 108% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 50GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 195658289 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4446 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 170087167 (09) Power-on hours count 38 38 54669 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1240 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 8590131226 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 44 9111142430 (C2) HDA temperature 30 56 55834574878 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 37 22 195658289 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -13069585425745 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4144102722 (F2) Unknown 100 253 591987939	56.9% Above average	Read 98 Write 100 Mixed 29 55% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.34 81% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 11 30% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	80x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	58x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	18x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	75x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	44x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16