Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 16 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 114 2-Core 222 72% 133 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 623 43% 402 Pts	64-Core 625 39% 625 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU) 44,235 User benchmarks, average bench 15% AMD(1002 15DD) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 20.8 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 6.52 Gravity 18.7 Splatting 18.2 12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 90 90 104 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 45	79.7% Very good	Read 503 Write 388 Mixed 466 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 9.58 97% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 8.77 57% 131 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 87%
JMicron 500GB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 330GB free Firmware: 0204 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 69.5 Mixed 60.4 48% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 1x8GB 5,207 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 13 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,714 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	826x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	790x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	751x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	780x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	449x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	419x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	351x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $58Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	184x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	260x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	198x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $413

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16