PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z87 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140711 |
Uptime | 2.4 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '18 at 20:52 |
Run Duration | 409 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB; Palit Geforce GTX 1060
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
79.3%
Very good
|
||||
87.5%
Excellent
|
||||
86.1%
Excellent
|
||||
Intenso Micro Line 4GB
0GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.95%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CM3B8G2C1600L11 0215 CMX8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples | 86x |
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples | 39x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 30x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $524 |