HP h8-1534

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1534  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 2AC8
Memory3.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '18 at 03:58
Run Duration69 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 81.1
44% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 163
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
913GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 134
Write 135
Mixed 137
102% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 10GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1534 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1534

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback