HP Pro 3305 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory11GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Pro 3305 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1h
Memory7.7 GB free of 11 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110629
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '18 at 08:47
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 450-$80
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 94.5
45% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 139
8-Core 141
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.79 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94
Write 101
Mixed 107
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.34
88% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter Atermiter Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 11GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3305 Series Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3305 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback