Gigabyte GA-X3V3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X3V3  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 13 '18 at 15:46
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 517
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Gigabyte(1458 1456) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 41.4
36% 42.6 fps
MRender 43.1
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 37
32% 40.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 815
Write 828
Mixed 841
185% 828 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 28
118% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 139
167% 290 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 135%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X3V3 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X3V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback