Apple MacBookAir5,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple MacBookAir5,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-2E6FAB96566FE58C
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '16 at 04:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3667U
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 139
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 207
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FE) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 2.91
4% 4.26 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.21 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM256E 251GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM09A1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 447
Write 232
Mixed 283
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 9.46
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 13.6
44% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 45.8
56% 102 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 97%
APPLE SD Card Reader 64GB
5GB free, PID 8404
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 14.9
Mixed 18.2
24% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.26
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 1.68
130% 2.54 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir5,2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir5,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback