Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170-Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 17:29
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7320-$42
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 97.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 250
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 359
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 3689) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 42.7
Parallax 53.9
37% 47.4 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 39.6
38% 48 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 472
Write 280
Mixed 369
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 19.8
120% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 48.1
73% 136 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 82%
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 4.44
Mixed 5.73
8% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
16% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 30.4
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback