User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 16:38
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3965U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 136
50% 86.4 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 140
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.07
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 3.22
2% 3.62 fps
MRender 5.14
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 8.17
5% 5.41 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 240GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 461
Write 330
Mixed 381
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 3.99
90% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 8.14
34% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 6.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback