Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 11:39
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 73
2-Core 130
56% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 323
38% 297 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 72
61% 74.3 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 74
59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0422C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 461
Write 235
Mixed 257
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 18.1
69% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 31.5
DQ Mixed 8.57
12% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 90%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 108
Write 116
Mixed 111
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.33
84% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
852GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 164
Mixed 154
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.69
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback