Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081230
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 12 '18 at 00:21
Run Duration422 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X2 240
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 81.5
44% 65.8 Pts
4-Core 79.1
8-Core 79.4
11% 79.2 Pts
64-Core 80.7
5% 80.7 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
2TB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 169
Mixed 159
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.18
98% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 83.5
Write 88.2
Mixed 69.2
60% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.44
104% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 62%
FiiO X3II USB-DISK 1GB
0GB free, PID 0003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.49% Terrible
Read 6.74
Write 2.74
Mixed 3.87
5% 4.45 MB/s
4K Read 3.36
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.04
15% 1.15 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.2
17% 6.03 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-M61PME-S2P Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M61PME-S2P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback