Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 REV 3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110328
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 11:55
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 339
47% 349 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 13
Parallax 14.4
14% 14.7 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.2
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST2OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 80.6
Write 85.2
Mixed 93.1
65% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.38
87% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1600C9DHX F3-12800CL9-2GBXL CM3X2G1600C9DHX F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 8GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 REV 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback