MSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B53
MotherboardMSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '18 at 23:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 214
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 584
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.8% Below average
Lighting 36.9
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 39.6
30% 37.1 fps
MRender 29.1
Gravity 27
Splatting 54.9
32% 37 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$31
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 502
Write 442
Mixed 382
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 4.7
64% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 7.6
43% 90.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
421GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 147
Mixed 112
101% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.28
90% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 113%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
502GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 55.2
Mixed 55.9
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.37
85% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.C16FDD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53) Builds (Compare 954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B360M PRO-VD (MS-7B53)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback