Intel DQ67SW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemINTEL_ DQ67SW__
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '18 at 05:22
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 359
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 49.8
Parallax 54.4
38% 50.1 fps
MRender 50.7
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 37.3
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
STT_FTA240MM25 240GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 378
Mixed 406
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 41.7
128% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 92.8
124% 226 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.M8FD 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback