User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemSemp STI
MotherboardSemp STI 005492
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '18 at 00:27
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8400-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 54.1
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 70.6
34% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 71.1
8-Core 73.8
10% 72.4 Pts
64-Core 71.2
4% 71.2 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT
EVGA(3842 C988) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 7.93
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 2.59
6% 6.21 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.22
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
97GB free
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 46.6
Mixed 24
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.21
4K Mixed 0.07
13% 0.11 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 35%
Maxtor STM380815AS 80GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.AAB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 61.4
Mixed 23.3
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.05
8% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback