Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '16 at 07:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 162
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 311
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Gigabyte(1458 21B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 7.92
Parallax 6.59
8% 8.02 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 11
7% 7.92 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 171
Mixed 141
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.19
4K Write 2.78
4K Mixed 0.35
140% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 109%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-80A0RT0 320GB
214GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 25.5
Mixed 27.2
35% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.23
56% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.8
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback