DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	21.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090728
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 07 '18 at 00:30
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	82%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 92.4 1-Core 73.1 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 352 39% 308 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Lighting 79.1 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 66.5 64% 74.2 fps	MRender 69.6 Gravity 71.1 Splatting 72.6 58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDCR120GB-MX 120GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 68197596 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 -4346506891580 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2733 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 51 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 37 43 34362556453 (C2) HDA temperature 37 43 34362556453 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 68197596 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 68197596 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 68197596 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8445 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7627 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7627 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3247	40.6% Average	Read 261 Write 129 Mixed 173 41% 188 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 14 58% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 91.2 DQ Mixed 48.2 51% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 150187832 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5417 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4116752 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9140 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2703 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BE) vendor-specific 59 57 95195693097 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 22369 (C2) HDA temperature 41 43 -140737488355287 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -5592047418318 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5444280817 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2941333120	94.7% Outstanding	Read 171 Write 159 Mixed 154 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.28 83% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 114%
G-DRIVE 2TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 245GB free Firmware: 2403 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 33.8 Mixed 34 26% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.98 4K Mixed 0.19 78% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	315x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16