Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 18:55
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 77.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 873
78% 660 Pts
64-Core 1,252
78% 1,252 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Zotac(19DA 2368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1761 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
66.6% Good
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 81.9
70% 83.5 fps
MRender 78.4
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 67.6
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 2,687
Write 1,354
Mixed 1,592
413% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 32.4
153% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 42.7
DQ Write 87.4
DQ Mixed 27.7
32% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 239%
Great: 292%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
51GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 498
Write 188
Mixed 276
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 3.74
78% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 4.27
14% 30 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 72%
Plextor M3 128GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62% Good
Read 502
Write 202
Mixed 287
72% 330 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 13.3
81% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 45.7
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62%
Great: 87%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 161
Mixed 165
122% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.06
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.24
108% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
118GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 92.2
Mixed 92.5
68% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.49
100% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 30.9
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 27.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac - $142

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $562
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback