Acer Aspire V3-772

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131011
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 01:21
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 87
2-Core 158
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 226
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Acer(1025 0781) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8569
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.59% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 11.7
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 14.5
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.59%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 128GB-$126
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126I Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 266
Write 158
Mixed 199
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 28
100% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.7
DQ Write 63.1
DQ Mixed 17.5
21% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
719GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 103
Mixed 103
76% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.24
79% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-055.A00LF HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback