Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 115 55% 89.4 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 684 55% 485 Pts	64-Core 1,286 80% 1,286 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H700 59GB 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.10 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Dell PERC H700 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 465GB free Firmware: 2.10 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 002C04B3802C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4G1 002C04B3802C 36J... 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.5% Above average	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 23.2 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	2x

RAM
M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 00CE00B380CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 01980097 9965516-045.A00LF 01980097 9965516-045.A0... 144GBUnknownBench 37%, 3 samples	2x
HMT31GR7BFR4A-H9 12x8GBHynixBench 64%, 55 samples	1x
HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 63%, 132 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16