Asrock B85 Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B85 Killer  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '18 at 18:17
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 546
59% 468 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.1% Very good
Lighting 96.7
Reflection 102
Parallax 102
79% 100 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 89.3
Splatting 76.5
68% 83.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN423b Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 501
Write 162
Mixed 241
66% 301 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 22.8
122% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 26.8
69% 148 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
165GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 129
Write 160
Mixed 157
112% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL11-11-11 D3-1600 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85 Killer Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B85 Killer - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback