Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results


Gaming 120% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 27 '18 at 17:49
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 6.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 87% 154 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 775 77% 629 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Lighting 187 Reflection 206 Parallax 186 152% 193 fps	MRender 129 Gravity 180 Splatting 132 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 128GB-$150 5,048 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 114 78764613 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 -9363028687815 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1459 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1207 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 51 30068113435 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 78764613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 78764613 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 78764613 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 89 89 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 55902 (EA) Unknown 0 0 15923 (F1) Unknown 0 0 15923 (F2) Unknown 0 0 25569	54.5% Above average	Read 406 Write 201 Mixed 246 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 10.5 83% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 79.5 DQ Mixed 56.2 41% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 86%
WD Re 2TB-$28 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 7658 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4885 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20931 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2060 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1194 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3689 (C2) HDA temperature 114 91 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3328 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	72.1% Very good	Read 142 Write 109 Mixed 131 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.65 4K Mixed 0.41 124% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 83%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268 8,165 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 782GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 198 192 3083 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2232 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 18812 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1782 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1278 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 953 (C2) HDA temperature 118 97 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	119% Outstanding	Read 232 Write 183 Mixed 172 147% 196 MB/s	4K Read 1.33 4K Write 4.15 4K Mixed 0.4 176% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 117%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 74GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 88 Write 84.4 Mixed 61.8 98% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.36 81% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.6% Above average	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 13 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 56.4 71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	32x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	31x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	10x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x

RAM
F3 DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 71%, 602 samples	5x
CMX4GX3M1A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ CMX8GX3M2A160 Kingston KHX1600C10D3L 24GBCorsairBench 45%, 9 samples	5x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBG.SKILLBench 85%, 84 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,805

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16