Lenovo 80XF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80XF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lyra
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '18 at 21:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 4
2-Core 8.1
3% 6.05 Pts
4-Core 12.2
8-Core 13.7
2% 12.9 Pts
64-Core 12.1
1% 12.1 Pts
Poor: 9% Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 38E3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.84
0% 0.84 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4064 63GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.3% Very poor
Read 109
Write 85.3
Mixed 104
22% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.43
4K Write 5.99
4K Mixed 3.5
16% 4.97 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.6
2% 0.8 GB/s
Latency 515
8% 515 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XF Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 80XF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback