User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDefault Default string
MotherboardMAXSUN MS-B350FX Gaming PRO
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150910
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 26 '18 at 12:02
Run Duration83 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 115
2-Core 231
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 638
69% 546 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 68
Parallax 71.4
46% 65.1 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 52.2
Splatting 55
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 141
Write 117
Mixed 119
94% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.18
65% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown VMA41UG-MEC1U2AW1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 33.6
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback