Asus H61M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H61M-C  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 22:40
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1571) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 37.6
Parallax 27.7
20% 29.9 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 25.2
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43% Average
Read 239
Write 103
Mixed 107
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 16.4
76% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 76.6
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 28.3
41% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43%
Great: 73%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
45GB free
Firmware: 3.AAF Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 75.2
Write 76.5
Mixed 73.3
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.34
81% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-C Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-C - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback