Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1824 x 1036 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140912
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 25 '18 at 18:43
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 206
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 595
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760 (192-bit)
Sapphire(174B 6265) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 30.2
17% 25 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 22
21% 26.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-256L9M 256GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HM81201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 466
Write 410
Mixed 441
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 15.8
83% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.4
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 76.4
46% 48 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 158
Mixed 142
117% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback