ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Unknow Unknow
Motherboard	DFI LP DK 790GX
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 05 '16 at 18:03
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9950 2,150 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 38.1 2-Core 76.6 42% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 149 8-Core 148 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 4870 22,563 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Device(0000 0000) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 8.73 Parallax 7.81 8% 8.86 fps	MRender 7.33 Gravity 7.43 Splatting 11.8 8% 8.85 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$124 11,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: O0919A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 55 (A3) Unknown 100 100 35 (A4) Unknown 100 100 838 (A5) Unknown 100 100 10 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5007 (F2) Unknown 100 100 4029 (F5) Unknown 100 100 6704	55.2% Above average	Read 255 Write 229 Mixed 246 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 19.5 84% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 19.8 45% 92.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,114 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 386GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 18.8 Mixed 19.3 25% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 9.2 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback