Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '18 at 16:41
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.2 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 918 83% 698 Pts	64-Core 1,292 80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp 8,552 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 194 Parallax 177 148% 184 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 184 Splatting 125 117% 144 fps
Poor: 114% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 140%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 561GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8925 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 311 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 56 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2773128361	96.6% Outstanding	Read 523 Write 418 Mixed 430 102% 457 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 31 136% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 92.4 100% 169 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 398GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11486 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 587 (B1) Unknown 99 99 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 61 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 76 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23355200226	104% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 415 Mixed 423 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 75.5 4K Mixed 43.9 160% 53.8 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 96.1 102% 169 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	248% Outstanding	Read 2,253 Write 1,428 Mixed 1,497 382% 1,726 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 51.9 196% 71.4 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 111 116% 192 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 248% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 83GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12328 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1224 (B1) Unknown 99 99 3 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 49 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 94 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7394416624	110% Outstanding	Read 529 Write 503 Mixed 519 116% 517 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 44.1 154% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 246 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 114 116% 188 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 692GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 74 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698548 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 899 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10782 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 547 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1714 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1714 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 197569675293 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.3% Good	Read 139 Write 84.9 Mixed 125 88% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.09 60% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C14-8GTZKW F4-3200C14-8GTZSW F4-3200C14-8GTZKW F4-3200C14-8GTZSW 32GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 42.4 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 37.6 113% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 31.9 95% 33.3 GB/s	Latency 63.8 63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	429x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	67x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	55x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $103Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $148Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	42x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $1,090

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16