Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '18 at 13:46
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 609
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Palit(1569 1189) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 34.4
Parallax 44.2
30% 38.6 fps
MRender 47.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 34.8
34% 41.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$150
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61110RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 465
Write 281
Mixed 329
79% 358 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 18.8
74% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 48.6
87% 172 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 119%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
4TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 150
Mixed 140
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.24
110% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 155
Write 147
Mixed 87.6
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$270
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
WD Re 3TB (2012)-$65
608GB free
Firmware: 01.01K01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 154
116% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.98
4K Mixed 0.44
133% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 96%
WD Re 2TB-$35
573GB free
Firmware: 01.01D02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 76.4
Write 70.2
Mixed 80.1
57% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.96
4K Mixed 0.38
122% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 55.6
72% 55.6 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback