HP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3662
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101122
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 20 '18 at 03:41
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U7300 1,665 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 10.4 2-Core 14.2 18% 21.7 Pts	4-Core 20.4 8-Core 22 3% 21.2 Pts	64-Core 19.7 1% 19.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% HP(103C 3662) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1892 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.24% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.31 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.27 fps	MRender 0.19 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.24 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.24% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8056 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 3139 (B1) Unknown 89 89 379 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 55 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 174 (F1) Unknown 99 99 26405975978	34.5% Below average	Read 247 Write 179 Mixed 201 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 10.2 41% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 33.7 DQ Write 21.7 DQ Mixed 11.7 13% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DM0-CH9 2x4GB 217 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	8.08% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.6 5% 1.67 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 8.08% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC

CPU
Core i3 U 330IntelBench 30%, 350 samples	8x
Core i5 U 470IntelBench 31%, 341 samples	5x
Core i3 U 380IntelBench 31%, 574 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	17x
Mobility Radeon HD 4350ATIBench 1%, 1,871 samples	3x
Mobility Radeon HD 4550ATIBench 1%, 81 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	2x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 6GBElpidaBench 37%, 247 samples	3x
8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 2x2GBMicronBench 34%, 1,373 samples	3x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16