Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 98.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 217
84% 144 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 590
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2627 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 47
Reflection 54.2
Parallax 44.1
38% 48.4 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 47
Splatting 61.3
48% 58.5 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
38GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 355
Write 243
Mixed 290
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 81.8
DQ Mixed 64.9
62% 100 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 86%
Intel 510 Series 250GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PWG4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 477
Write 313
Mixed 376
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 15.8
61% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 74.5
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 25.2
28% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
17GB free
Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 350
Write 170
Mixed 198
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 11.3
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 47.3
56% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
10GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 529
Write 267
Mixed 297
80% 364 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 36.4
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 112
123% 213 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
258GB free
Firmware: 1AA01109 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 93
Write 106
Mixed 89.7
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.51
129% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 63%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
21GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 109
Mixed 78
71% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.47
115% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport Essential USB 3.0 500GB
121GB free, PID 0730
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 61.1
Write 60.8
Mixed 47.3
71% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.12
48% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 32%
Seagate GoFlex Slim 500GB
74GB free, PID 517a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 70.8
Write 73.9
Mixed 66.5
91% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Xtreem-LV-2133 04CD F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 04EF Xtreem-LV-2133 04CD F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.6% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 23.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 43.6
92% 43.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback