Asus ET2010AG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ET2010AG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek ET2010AG
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20100914
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 19 '18 at 00:52
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 250u
Socket AM2/S1G2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Memory 32.8
1-Core 11.6
2-Core 25.9
16% 23.4 Pts
4-Core 28.5
8-Core 33.7
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 22.1
1% 22.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD serie 5000
Asus(1043 8430) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.97.10.6
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.19
Parallax 1.69
1% 1.79 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2.13
1% 1.62 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 91.2
Write 80.3
Mixed 59.6
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.25
73% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1599 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 2.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 1.6
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET2010AG Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2010AG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback