Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	8.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '18 at 02:13
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS) 428 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 22.4 1-Core 124 2-Core 210 59% 119 Pts	4-Core 410 8-Core 390 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 385 24% 385 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 04FB) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.4% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 54.5 Parallax 75.5 45% 61.8 fps	MRender 62.3 Gravity 57.3 Splatting 51.1 46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 168GB 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 Max speed: Unknown Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x10GB 540 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1 of 1 slots used 10GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 4.3 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 303 13% 303 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 110%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16