HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20161017
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 20:32
Run Duration444 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 69.2
2-Core 132
58% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 458
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 635
39% 635 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300
HP(103C 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 311.66
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 0.44
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080BH PL 80GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00840029 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26
Write 25.7
Mixed 22.8
19% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.22
37% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 21%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 2.53
Mixed 3.83
7% 7.58 MB/s
4K Read 2.81
4K Write 0.007
4K Mixed 0.008
11% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B5170EM1-CH9 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback