TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime10.9 Days
Run DateApr 17 '18 at 19:22
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 107
38% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 152
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 39% Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 3.84
3% 3.81 fps
MRender 3.71
Gravity 3.63
Splatting 5.52
4% 4.29 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.34%
 Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tph00500 500GB 500GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 107
Mixed 91.7
73% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.25
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 56.8%
 Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD  $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples103x
FX-8300AMD  $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples43x
FX-4300AMD  $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples25x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples44x
GTX 1050Nvidia  $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples37x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples14x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples15x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples8x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples7x
RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 564 samples8x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback