Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100827
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '18 at 15:34
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 158 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 390 42% 334 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 3771) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 40.2 Parallax 54 36% 46.1 fps	MRender 53.7 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 36.7 37% 46.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 16989 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 306 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 53 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24666448275	30.2% Below average	Read 146 Write 105 Mixed 109 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 14.6 54% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 36.1 DQ Mixed 14.6 16% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 51GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 31696 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 574 (B1) Unknown 96 96 118 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 50 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 55 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16317692366	36.5% Below average	Read 163 Write 127 Mixed 142 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 17.3 67% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26 DQ Write 50.3 DQ Mixed 17.8 19% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 116%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 145 10725 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 282 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16748 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 277 (10) Unknown 1 199 19814415105 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 262 (C2) HDA temperature 112 97 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	57.2% Above average	Read 105 Write 94.6 Mixed 101 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.32 102% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 98%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 846 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 23GB free, PID 0743 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 22 Write 13.2 Mixed 9.99 17% 15.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.05 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.007 16% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.6 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	257x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	156x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	142x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	45x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	43x

SSD
AGILITY3 60GBOCZBench 42%, 14,293 samples	23x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	325x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	230x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $159

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16