Apple MacPro2,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro2,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F4208DA9
Memory7.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '16 at 23:14
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5365
CPU-A ( 0 ), 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 69
37% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 137
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 137
8% 137 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.9
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC3C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 119
Write 120
Mixed 77.2
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.48
86% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro2,1 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacPro2,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback