Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '18 at 09:41
Run Duration525 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6420K APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23% Poor
Memory 31
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 83.9
29% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 94.1
12% 90.2 Pts
64-Core 92.8
6% 92.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 4.42
Parallax 4.84
4% 4.72 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 409
Write 116
Mixed 145
48% 224 MB/s
4K Read 9.53
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 6.21
36% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 49.6
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 21
22% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 160
Write 148
Mixed 147
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.37
123% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
289GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 86.4
Mixed 74.5
63% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.58
125% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 58%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Read 8.83
Write 3.18
Mixed 4.09
6% 5.37 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
3% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 38%
WDC WD32 00BPVT-80JJ5T0 320GB
1GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 29.8
Mixed 29.6
39% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.19
50% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback