HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory3.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080505
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '16 at 18:04
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450-$299
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 86.1
40% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 172
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 5600
Nvidia(10DE 0409) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 8.13
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 3.31
7% 6.67 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 6.39
5% 6.64 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Keith 1TB
820GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 123
Mixed 109
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.66
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 41GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 1024, 2048, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback