Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320MA-M.2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '18 at 01:55
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 63
2-Core 119
50% 83.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 196
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.83% Terrible
Lighting 9.53
Reflection 12
Parallax 11.4
8% 11 fps
MRender 9.14
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 11
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.83%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
616GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 86.9
Mixed 84.7
66% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.39
97% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42
274GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 76.1
Write 74
Mixed 72.7
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
125% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
192GB free
Firmware: 3.AFM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 63.4
Write 3.21
Mixed 56.9
32% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.35
79% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 13.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback