HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z220 CMT Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1790
Memory21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '18 at 20:37
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 V2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 81.1
2-Core 67.8
54% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 261
26% 214 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000
HP(103C 030C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 40.7
25% 33.7 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 28.2
Splatting 35.9
26% 30.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 487
Mixed 475
109% 489 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 26.7
127% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 23.9
58% 113 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 95%
Great: 115%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
418GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 136
Write 68.1
Mixed 87.5
73% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.76
4K Mixed 0.11
48% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback