Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '18 at 15:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 116
58% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 206
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1593 MHz, MLim: 1727 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 32.9
32% 36.2 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 35.3
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BW056H6 56GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 382
Write 80.4
Mixed 134
43% 199 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 17.6
79% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 84.1
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 6.33
29% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
195GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 107
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.52
109% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A 99U5471-012.A 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 19
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 13
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback