Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G31M-S2C  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090414
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 07 '18 at 21:50
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 26.5
2-Core 26.1
32% 41 Pts
4-Core 43
8-Core 44.4
6% 43.7 Pts
64-Core 30.9
2% 30.9 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-19 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 48.9
Write 42.8
Mixed 43.6
34% 45.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
69% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 42%
Maxtor 2F040L0 40GB
7GB free
Firmware: VAM51JJ0 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 35.4
Write 31.1
Mixed 30.4
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.35
74% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 25%
Maxtor STM3160815AS 160GB
2GB free
Firmware: 4.AAB Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 37.6
Write 44.7
Mixed 63.1
37% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.28
75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 4.4
15% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 3.6
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G31M-S2C Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback