Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 05 '18 at 17:37
Run Duration331 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 53.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
70% 133 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 898
80% 677 Pts
64-Core 2,431
150% 2,431 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.2% Below average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 48.9
Parallax 56.6
39% 51.1 fps
MRender 51.3
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 38.5
37% 45.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ES22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 148
Mixed 128
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.21
75% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 79.5
Mixed 103
75% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
644GB free
Firmware: SC12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 151
Write 119
Mixed 102
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.26
85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 98%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
29GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 210
Write 19.8
Mixed 28.3
72% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 41%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 4GB
4GB free, PID 8989
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.17% Terrible
Read 7.09
Write 6.05
Mixed 6.49
8% 6.54 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
13% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.7% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 23.5
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $968
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback