ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu D3239-A1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Fujitsu D3239-A1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3239-A1
Memory	18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140730
Uptime	15 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '18 at 08:12
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 60.8 1-Core 34.4 2-Core 110 41% 68.4 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 383 51% 383 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI RAID 5/6 SAS 6G 999GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 349 Write 22.7 Mixed 40 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 1.36 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.23 87% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 179%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2TB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 30.6 Mixed 21.9 36% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.23 86% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 48%
Maxtor OneTouch 1TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 931GB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 32.2 Mixed 12.6 32% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.36 62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 20%
TANDBERG RDX 2TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 61GB free, PID 0006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 35.6 Write 29.1 Mixed 9.95 29% 24.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 3x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 13.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback