Lenovo 80UR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80UR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo N23
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 20:39
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 27.8
1-Core 20.3
2-Core 31.2
17% 26.4 Pts
4-Core 31.6
8-Core 42.1
5% 36.8 Pts
64-Core 36.3
2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 39FF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 2.44
1% 2.35 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.34 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung BGND3R 31GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 120
Write 22.5
Mixed 33.9
13% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.77
4K Write 7.35
4K Mixed 5.18
22% 6.77 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 5.03 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 268
15% 268 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80UR Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80UR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback