Acer Aspire V3-771

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-771  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HC
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131021
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 04 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 82.2
1-Core 85
2-Core 145
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 195
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0686) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 2.75
3% 3.98 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.61
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 482
Write 189
Mixed 274
69% 315 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 5.55
71% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 7.04
34% 76.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 72%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
658GB free
Firmware: AX0R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 89.6
Write 93.9
Mixed 94.7
70% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-771 Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-771

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback